Was looking through
Metafilter, as I do every day, when I came across a link about artist
Antonio Riello's art project of "turning real military items into fashion accessories for ladies".
They kind of make me twitchy. I will be the first to claim that I "fail" at a lot of stereotypical "girl" things. There is a good portion of my family who can (and will) gush and rave about Italian designers and can throw around those kinds of names in real conversation and not sound like they're faking. These are people who can put together very nice
outfits, while I've given up and have a closet full of jeans, black pants, and black t-shirts so I don't have to try too hard. And I'm not being derogatory in any way, shape, or form to women (and men) who
do have this kind of knowledge. It's something I don't understand, but it is still knowledge, and I can and do respect that.
That being said, these weapons make me twitchy. And not because I like the black and gunmetal blue steel that standard firearms come in. Nor is it solely that I feel that it's sort of disrespectful to the weapon to put fake jewels and leopard print skins on it, even though it is. (As an aside, ever since I stabbed myself in the hand with a new Leatherman Wave blade and it took four stitches to fix and a lot of dumb luck that I didn't lose any motor skills from it, I have had a healthy
respect for weapons in all shapes, sizes, and forms. They are
not toys, nor should they
ever be treated as such. This is twinging on that.)
No, they make me twitchy because it feels like some underlying conception that weapons need to be made to look "pretty" in order for a woman to use them. Um, what? This isn't like the
LadySmith line from Smith & Wesson, where the actual difference is a smaller grip to make it fit a woman's hand better. ( Which is acceptable because it's a
biological difference there.) Maybe this is Riello's point, that there is this underlying assumption there. But somehow, I doubt it.